Legal Snippets

Krishan Kumar Vs SDM Rohini

Hon’ble Supreme Court on refund of un-utilized stamp. In the present case, the event of charge of collecting court fee has not occurred as the petitioner claims that he did not file the Suit for the purposes of which the e-stamp paper was purchased. Therefore, there was no authority with the State to retain the […]

In Re: Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services During Pandemic

Hon’ble Supreme Court on limitations of the digital system, and the inability of masses to reach the ground. Wherein marginalized are people worst affected due to limitation of digital means reaching them. “There exists a digital divide in India, particularly between the rural and urban areas. The extent of the advances made in improving digital […]

The State of Bihar Vs Basawan Singh

Hon’ble Supreme Court on whether Bribe Giver could be considered an accomplice in a corruption case? What is the evidentiary value of the Bribe Giver in the trial? The correct rule is this : if any of the witnesses are accomplices who are particeps criminis in respect of the actual crime charged, their evidence must […]

Gian Singh Vs State Of Punjab

Hon’ble Supreme Court on quashing of Criminal cases held that the cases having predominantly civil flavor can be easily quashed down by the Court. But the criminal cases having overwhelmingly and pre-dominatingly civil flavour stand on different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly the offences arising from commercial, financial, mercantile, civil, partnership or such […]

Union Of India Vs Tata Chemicals Limited

Hon’ble Supreme Court on refund of money by taxing authority. Providing for payment of interest in case of refund of amounts paid as tax or deemed tax or advance tax is a method now statutorily adopted by fiscal legislation to ensure that the aforesaid amount of tax which has been duly paid in prescribed time […]

Rahul S. Shah Vs Jinendra kumar Gandhi

The Hon’ble Supreme Court taking cognizance of the malaise of constant abuse of procedural provisions which defeats justice, i.e. frivolous attempts by unsuccessful litigants to putting up spurious objections and setting up third parties, to object, delay and obstruct the execution of a decree. Directed following guidelines. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Central Coalfields Limited Vs Parden Oraon

Hon’ble Supreme Court on Compassionate Appointment. The whole object of granting compassionate appointment is to enable the family to tide over the sudden crisis which arises due to the death of the sole breadwinner. The mere death of an employee in harness does not entitle his family to such source of livelihood. The authority concerned […]

Eva Glawischnig Piesczek Vs Facebook Ireland LTD

Hon’ble Court of Justice European Union on Court’s power to compel intermediaries to remove content from website. Given that a social network facilitates the swift flow of information stored by the host provider between its different users, there is a genuine risk that information which was held to be illegal is subsequently reproduced and shared […]

Sopan Sukhdeo Sable Vs Assistant Charity Commissioner

The provision contained in this rule that the plaint shall be rejected in the four cases mentioned in the rule is mandatory. In a case, therefore, where the relief claimed was properly valued, but the plaint was written upon paper insufficiently stamped, and the plaintiff, on being required by the court to supply the requisite […]

Food Corporation Of India Vs M/S.Chandu Construction

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on Arbitration Agreement. “It is trite to say that the arbitrator being a creature of the agreement between the parties, he has to operate within the four corners of the agreement and if he ignores the specific terms of the contract, it would be a question of jurisdictional error on […]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit lawyers and law firms from soliciting work and advertising. By proceeding further and clicking on the “I AGREE” button herein below, I hereby acknowledge that I, of my own accord, intend to know more and subsequently acquire more information about Arms Length Legal for my own purpose and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no advertisement, solicitation, communication, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Arms Length Legal or any of its members to create or solicit an attorney-client relationship through this website. I further acknowledge having read and understood and perused through the content of the DISCLAIMER mentioned below and the Privacy Policy.

DISCLAIMER

This website (www.armslengthlegal.com) is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct and complete. Arms Length Legal does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Any information obtained or downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and their own discretion and any further transmission, receipt or use of this website would not create any attorney-client relationship. The contents of this website do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. All material and information (except any statutory enactments and/ or judicial precedents) on this website is the property of Arms Length Legal and no part thereof shall be used, without the express prior written consent of Arms Length Legal.