Legal Snippets

Avitel Post Studioz Ltd Vs HSBC PI Holding (Mauritius) Ltd

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the scope of the arbitration agreement is defined by the Arbitration Agreement itself. And arbitration cannot proceed on public law remedies, and construction needs to be strictly done within the framework of Contract Law. After these judgments, it is clear that “serious allegations of fraud” arise only if either […]

Avitel Post Studioz Ltd Vs HSBC PI Holding (Mauritius) Ltd Read More »

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd Vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in regards with construction of a Tender Document. We must reiterate the words of caution that this Court has stated right from the time when Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India[6] was decided almost 40 years ago, namely, that the words used in the tender documents cannot be ignored

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd Vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd. Read More »

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary vs State Of Maharashtra

“Only such omissions which amount to contradiction in material particulars can be used to discredit the testimony of the witness. The omission in the police statement by itself would not necessarily render the testimony of witness unreliable. When the version given by the witness in the Court is different in material particulars from that disclosed

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary vs State Of Maharashtra Read More »

Google Spain SL, Google Inc. Vs Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)

European Court of Justice ruled that the European citizens have a right to request that commercial search firms, such as Google, that gather personal information for profit should remove links to private information when asked, provided the information is no longer relevant. The Court did not say newspapers should remove articles. For More Information Contact

Google Spain SL, Google Inc. Vs Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) Read More »

Star Enterprises Vs City And Industrial Development Cor. of Maharashtra Ltd.

While dealing with tenders, State is entitled to look for the best deal and for that it can refuse to accept even the lowest bid. But while rejecting the lowest offer in the tender it must record reasons for such action and communicate the same to the concerned party. The natural justice speaking for the

Star Enterprises Vs City And Industrial Development Cor. of Maharashtra Ltd. Read More »