Legal Snippets

Book ordinarily means a collection of sheets of paper, or other material, blank written, or printed, fastened or bound together so as to form a material whole. Loose sheets or scraps of paper cannot be termed as “book” for they can be easily detached and replaced. In dealing with the word “book” in Mukundram v […]

Today, corruption in India not only poses a grave danger to the concept of constitutional governance, it also threatens the very foundation of Indian democracy and the Rule of Law. The magnitude of corruption in our public life is incompatible with the concept of a socialist, secular democratic republic. It cannot be disputed that where

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that a basic requirement of Article 14 of the Constitution of India is fairness in action by the State and that non-arbitrariness in essence and substance is the heartbeat of fair play. Fixation of a value of the tender, although entirely within the purview of the executive, leaving little role

Hon’ble Supreme Court in regards with “REVIEW”. Different situations may arise in relation to review petitions filed before a Court or Tribunal. One of the situations could be where the review application is allowed, the decree or order passed by the Court or Tribunal is vacated and the appeal/proceedings in which the same is made

S 406 of CrPC deals with the power of the Supreme Court to transfer a case, on an application made by an interested party. Giving expansive meaning to the term “party interested” the Hon’ble Court held even the State can be party interested. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on right to health, and commitment of Government of India towards afforestation. The right to clean and healthy environment has been recognized as the fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Article 48-A imposes duty upon the State to endeavour to protect and improve the environment and

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] Hon’ble Surpeme Court in regards with s 42 of NDPS Act. In other words, the compliance with the requirements of Sections 42 (1) and 42(2) in regard to writing down the information received and sending a copy thereof to the superior officer, should normally precede the entry, search and seizure by the officer. But

The Menace of frivolous litigation is a severe problem in the Indian scenario, which is exacerbated by the fact, of prolonged litigation. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India took cognizance of the same and observed that huge costs ought to be imposed in such cases. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Hon’ble High Court of Madras taking cognizance of the problem stray animals have been facing during this pandemic. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta