The State Of Uttar Pradesh Vs Jail Superintendent (Ropar)
S 406 of CrPC deals with the power of the Supreme Court to transfer a case, on an application made by an interested party. Giving expansive meaning to the term “party interested” the Hon’ble Court held even the State can be party interested. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta
Association For Protection Of Democratic Rights Vs State of West Bengal
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on right to health, and commitment of Government of India towards afforestation. The right to clean and healthy environment has been recognized as the fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Article 48-A imposes duty upon the State to endeavour to protect and improve the environment and […]
Karnail Singh Vs State of Haryana
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] Hon’ble Surpeme Court in regards with s 42 of NDPS Act. In other words, the compliance with the requirements of Sections 42 (1) and 42(2) in regard to writing down the information received and sending a copy thereof to the superior officer, should normally precede the entry, search and seizure by the officer. But […]
Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes Vs Erasmo Jack De Sequeria
The Menace of frivolous litigation is a severe problem in the Indian scenario, which is exacerbated by the fact, of prolonged litigation. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India took cognizance of the same and observed that huge costs ought to be imposed in such cases. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta
V.E.Shiva Vs The Principal Secretary
Hon’ble High Court of Madras taking cognizance of the problem stray animals have been facing during this pandemic. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta
Abraham Ajith Vs Inspector Of Police
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India defining “Cause of Action”. It is settled law that cause of action consists of bundle of facts, which give cause to enforce the legal inquiry for redress in a court of law. In other words, it is a bundle of facts, which taken with the law applicable to them, gives […]
Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs State Of Haryana
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on appointment on compassionate grounds. The question relates to the considerations which should guide while giving appointment in public services on compassionate ground. It appears that there has been a good deal of obfuscation on the issue. As a rule, appointments in the public services should be made strictly on […]
Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya Vs The State Of Gujarat
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, explaining the Scope of Magistrate’s power under the aegis of 156(3) of the CrPC. Explaining that the power envisaged under 156 (3) is expansive in nature, and not only it includes the power to order an investigation by way of registration of FIR but also includes the power to order […]
Mrs. S.Sushma Vs Director General of Police
Today is International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Intersexism, and Transphobia (IDAHOBIT), one of the most crucial legs of the same is to educate yourself. So today sharing excerpts from a Judgment from the Hon’ble High Court of Madras wherein the judge when confronted with the issue before it, took time out to educate himself about […]
Vriend Vs Alberta
Recently I encountered a case wherein a person who identified himself as a part of the LGBTQ Community, was facing trauma at the hands of family members i.e. parents. Who would force the person to go to a psychologist, who in the name of “Treatment” would not hesitate even in using coercive methods, including physically […]