B. M/ THIMMAIAH VS T. M. RUKIMINI

In the case of Defamation, the victim is entitled to both civil as well criminal remedies. Whereas civil remedy is available through a claim for Damages in Tort Law, this judgment elucidates important factors for the Tort of Defamation. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary vs State Of Maharashtra

Hon’ble Supreme Court on corroboration and contradiction in Evidence Act. “Only such omissions which amount to contradiction in material particulars can be used to discredit the testimony of the witness. The omission in the police statement by itself would not necessarily render the testimony of witness unreliable. When the version given by the witness in […]

डब्‍बा ट्रेडिंग व धोखाधडी से हुये नुकसान की शिकायत कैसे करें

शेयर मार्केट अथवा स्‍टॉक मार्केट एक ऐसा मार्केट है जहां पर बहुत सारी कंपनियों के शेयर खरीदे व बेचे जाते है । यह एक ऐसी जगह है जहां पर या तो लोग बहुत तेजी से पैसे कमा लेते है अथवा कई लोग अपने सारे पैसे गवां भी देते हैं । पहले शेयरों की खरीद व […]

Kamal Khare Vs State of MP

The full bench of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh answered the question of whether the National Security Act be invoked in the case of a supply of adulterated food, that is harmful and dangerous to a large number of citizens. While adjudicating simultaneous applicability of the Food Safety and Standard Act, and National […]

Radha Krishna Industries Vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Hon’ble Supreme Court on power of Provisional Attachment under aegis of GST Act. For more details contact @Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Pandurang Dattatraya Khandekar v. The Bar Council of Maharashtra, Bombay

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on Professional Misconduct. “The test of what constitutes “grossly improper conduct in the discharge of professional duties” has been laid down in many cases. In the case of in re A Solicitor Ex parte the Law Society (1912) 1 KB 302, Darling, J. adopted the definition of “infamous conduct in […]

GKN Drive Shafts (India) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer

GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. is one of the most landmark judgments in regards to the interpretation of S. 148 of the Income-tax. It primarily talks about the Assessee’s right to seek reasons for notice given under the aegis of S 148 of Income Tax. The judgment suggests a model way tackle notices received under the […]

Canara Bank v Shri Debasis Das

This is in continuation to the post I made yesterday, therein it was contended that under the aegis of Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessing officer while issuing the notice ought to have disclosed the “reasons of belief”. Whereas the subsection of the abovementioned section makes it compulsory on part of the […]

Mithlesh Kumar Tripathi v. Commissioner of Income-tax

Recently had an opportunity to deal in a matter involving S 148 of the Income Tax Act, wherein the assessee was served with a notice under the aegis of the abovementioned section. To my utter surprise when I looked prima facie at the Section it just mentioned that the Assessing officer had grounds to believe […]

Laxmibai Chandaragi B v. State of Karnataka

The work of Babasaheb, speaks across generations, and the relevance of work finds resonance even today. Recently whilst deciding a judgment, where two adults belonging to different castes faced the wrath of communities, in the name of family, community, caste, wanted to get married on their own accord. The Hon’ble Supreme Court came to their […]