In re Kenneth Humphrey
Any lawyer practicing in court in India could attest to the fact that various people accused of various crimes, even after getting a favorable bail order are not able to exercise their liberty, the same may be originating from various reasons but mostly from the poor financial condition the accused suffers. It is further to be noted that intersectionality of various other factors along with financial unwell being might again be one of the most prominent reasons why the person ended up in Jail in the first place. Various reforms have taken place in India’s justice delivery system, to tackle the arrest at first instance as well, but the problem is very prominent. California’s Supreme Court recently took cognizance of the same, and observed that indigent people cannot be allowed to languish in jail just because they are not able to post bail, and equated such practice “pretrial detention order”.
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India
Judicial Independence is a crucial matter, as it ensures that the trusted public reposit in the same, continue to exist. As it is the judiciary that has been entrusted with the duty to protect values enshrined in the constitution and protect the fundamental rights. For more details contact @ Advocate Prakhar Gupta
Sukhdev Singh v Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi and anothers.
The impact of the growth of Corporations on the socio-economic life of people has been felt in the daily life of people, Government has also taken up various social and economic functions through various structures, which do not fit neatly into preconceived notions of legal categories. Whilst interpreting the definition of state under the aegis […]
R. K. Garg and ors v. Union of India
Relationship between morality and law is very intriguing. But when it comes to application of the same, through courts of law, how is it supposed to play? This judgment by the Supreme Court throws light on the same.
Ghostline Legal