Venkatagiri Vs Hindu Religious Endowments Board

A civil revision at the instance of a litigant is maintainable on satisfaction of the following circumstances: –1.a. Impugned order amounts to a case decidedb. Such order must have been passed by any court subordinate to such High Courtc. Such order must not appealable one2. There must be allegation of jurisdictional error, i.e. to say:a. […]

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs Special Judicial Magistrate

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India holding The rules of procedure are made to advance the cause of justice and not to defeat it. That the court is empowered to provide justice even when wrong procedures have been referred to. ” Nomenclature under which petition is filed is not quite relevant and that does not debar […]

Alka Khandu Avhad Vs Amar Syamprasad Mishra

On a fair reading of Section 138 of the NI Act, before a person can be prosecuted, the following conditions are required to be satisfied: that the cheque is drawn by a person and on an account maintained by him with a banker; for the payment of any amount of money to another person from […]

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary vs State Of Maharashtra

“Only such omissions which amount to contradiction in material particulars can be used to discredit the testimony of the witness. The omission in the police statement by itself would not necessarily render the testimony of witness unreliable. When the version given by the witness in the Court is different in material particulars from that disclosed […]

Google Spain SL, Google Inc. Vs Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)

European Court of Justice ruled that the European citizens have a right to request that commercial search firms, such as Google, that gather personal information for profit should remove links to private information when asked, provided the information is no longer relevant. The Court did not say newspapers should remove articles. For More Information Contact […]

Star Enterprises Vs City And Industrial Development Cor. of Maharashtra Ltd.

While dealing with tenders, State is entitled to look for the best deal and for that it can refuse to accept even the lowest bid. But while rejecting the lowest offer in the tender it must record reasons for such action and communicate the same to the concerned party. The natural justice speaking for the […]

Mukundram VS Dayaram

Book ordinarily means a collection of sheets of paper, or other material, blank written, or printed, fastened or bound together so as to form a material whole. Loose sheets or scraps of paper cannot be termed as “book” for they can be easily detached and replaced. In dealing with the word “book” in Mukundram v […]

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs Dr. Manmohan Singh

Today, corruption in India not only poses a grave danger to the concept of constitutional governance, it also threatens the very foundation of Indian democracy and the Rule of Law. The magnitude of corruption in our public life is incompatible with the concept of a socialist, secular democratic republic. It cannot be disputed that where […]

Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd Vs State Of Karnataka

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that a basic requirement of Article 14 of the Constitution of India is fairness in action by the State and that non-arbitrariness in essence and substance is the heartbeat of fair play. Fixation of a value of the tender, although entirely within the purview of the executive, leaving little role […]

DSR Steel (Private) Ltd. Vs State Of Rajasthan

Hon’ble Supreme Court in regards with “REVIEW”. Different situations may arise in relation to review petitions filed before a Court or Tribunal. One of the situations could be where the review application is allowed, the decree or order passed by the Court or Tribunal is vacated and the appeal/proceedings in which the same is made […]