lawyer rajasthan

General Manager, Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. Vs Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India delineates on way to determine the value of the land. In the present case, a certain piece of land was acquired by ONGC under the aegis of the Land Acquisition Act, and determination of the value of land became crucial to determine valuation. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

National Human Rights Commission Vs State Of Arunachal Pradesh

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, holding that the fundamental rights are an intrinsic part of the constitution. Holding that the state is duty-bound to protect the fundamental rights of every person. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

State Of West Bengal vs Mohammed Khalid

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, defining the word “Cognizance”. In its broad and literal sense, it means taking notice of an offence. This would include the intention of initiating judicial proceedings against the offender in respect of that offence or taking steps to see whether there is any basis for initiating judicial proceedings or […]

Mohd. Iqbal Khanday vs Abdul Majid Rather

Hon’ble Supreme Court in regards with Contempt of Court. Having regard to the above, we have got to balance the dignity of the Court in requiring obedience to its orders as against the performance of an act contrary to rules compelled by the court’s direction. The law of contempt is based on sound public policy […]

N NAGENDRA RAO Vs STATE OF A.P.

Hon’ble Supreme Court, limiting the scope of defense of sovereignty as called by the state, giving way to various rights to its individual. In this particular decision, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the difference between sovereign and non-sovereign function is diminishing. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Hari Krishna Mandir Trust Vs State of Maharashtra

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has held that Article 21 imposes on the state an obligation to safeguard the life of every person. The state-run hospitals and the medical officers employed therein are duty-bound to extend medical assistance for preserving human life. Violation of this duty amounts to a violation of article 21. Therefore, […]

Uday Shankar Triyar Vs Ram Kalewar Prasad Singh

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in this landmark judgment laid down the importance of procedural law. Mere lapse in procedure wouldn’t lead to automatic denial of a right unless so specified by the statute itself. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

Indian School, Jodhpur Vs State of Rajasthan

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India recently pronounced a judgement in regards to fees structure for private unaided schools in Rajasthan. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

State of Orissa Vs Bimal Kumar Mohanty

In this landmark judgment the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, while elucidating the difference between suspension and termination, highlights the scope and intention behind the suspension. As the suspension is generally done pending investigation, and with an intent to ensure a free and fair investigation. For More Information Contact Advocate Prakhar Gupta

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit lawyers and law firms from soliciting work and advertising. By proceeding further and clicking on the “I AGREE” button herein below, I hereby acknowledge that I, of my own accord, intend to know more and subsequently acquire more information about Arms Length Legal for my own purpose and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no advertisement, solicitation, communication, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Arms Length Legal or any of its members to create or solicit an attorney-client relationship through this website. I further acknowledge having read and understood and perused through the content of the DISCLAIMER mentioned below and the Privacy Policy.

DISCLAIMER

This website (www.armslengthlegal.com) is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct and complete. Arms Length Legal does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Any information obtained or downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and their own discretion and any further transmission, receipt or use of this website would not create any attorney-client relationship. The contents of this website do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. All material and information (except any statutory enactments and/ or judicial precedents) on this website is the property of Arms Length Legal and no part thereof shall be used, without the express prior written consent of Arms Length Legal.