Legal Snippets

GKN Drive Shafts (India) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer

GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. is one of the most landmark judgments in regards to the interpretation of S. 148 of the Income-tax. It primarily talks about the Assessee’s right to seek reasons for notice given under the aegis of S 148 of Income Tax. The judgment suggests a model way tackle notices received under the […]

Canara Bank v Shri Debasis Das

This is in continuation to the post I made yesterday, therein it was contended that under the aegis of Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessing officer while issuing the notice ought to have disclosed the “reasons of belief”. Whereas the subsection of the abovementioned section makes it compulsory on part of the […]

Mithlesh Kumar Tripathi v. Commissioner of Income-tax

Recently had an opportunity to deal in a matter involving S 148 of the Income Tax Act, wherein the assessee was served with a notice under the aegis of the abovementioned section. To my utter surprise when I looked prima facie at the Section it just mentioned that the Assessing officer had grounds to believe […]

Laxmibai Chandaragi B v. State of Karnataka

The work of Babasaheb, speaks across generations, and the relevance of work finds resonance even today. Recently whilst deciding a judgment, where two adults belonging to different castes faced the wrath of communities, in the name of family, community, caste, wanted to get married on their own accord. The Hon’ble Supreme Court came to their […]

In re Kou-Chan Technologies (P.) Ltd.

Whether charges for insurance by taxi aggregators, amount to GST liability? The Hon’ble Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka, held the same in negative.

Nandan Biomatrix Ltd. vs S. Ambika Devi

A seed-related company often the purpose of producing foundation and other commercial seeds, an arrangement is entered between farmers and seed companies regarding the sale and buyback. This litigation by farmers is often made before Consumer Forums, for grievance redressal, this particular judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India defines whether such arrangement would […]

State Of Gujarat vs Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal

Economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail. The economic offence having deep rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds needs to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby […]

Vasu Dev Singh v. Union of India

In delegated legislation the delegate completes the legislation by supplying details within the limits prescribed by the statute and in the case of conditional legislation the power of legislation is exercised by the legislature conditionally leaving to the discretion of an external authority the time and manner of carrying its legislation into effect as also […]

Kerala Public Service Commission and Ors. vs. Sini, K

A married woman is not disqualified for an appointment and the fact that she is pregnant in itself is not a disqualification for participating in the selection process, nor the pregnancy can be treated as a bar for appointment under the scheme. It is to be noted that a pregnant woman cannot be denied an […]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit lawyers and law firms from soliciting work and advertising. By proceeding further and clicking on the “I AGREE” button herein below, I hereby acknowledge that I, of my own accord, intend to know more and subsequently acquire more information about Arms Length Legal for my own purpose and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no advertisement, solicitation, communication, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Arms Length Legal or any of its members to create or solicit an attorney-client relationship through this website. I further acknowledge having read and understood and perused through the content of the DISCLAIMER mentioned below and the Privacy Policy.

DISCLAIMER

This website (www.armslengthlegal.com) is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct and complete. Arms Length Legal does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Any information obtained or downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and their own discretion and any further transmission, receipt or use of this website would not create any attorney-client relationship. The contents of this website do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. All material and information (except any statutory enactments and/ or judicial precedents) on this website is the property of Arms Length Legal and no part thereof shall be used, without the express prior written consent of Arms Length Legal.