Vasu Dev Singh v. Union of India
In delegated legislation the delegate completes the legislation by supplying details within the limits prescribed by the statute and in the case of conditional legislation the power of legislation is exercised by the legislature conditionally leaving to the discretion of an external authority the time and manner of carrying its legislation into effect as also […]
The Ahmedabad St. Xaviers College vs State Of Gujarat
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on Protection of Minorities and Freedom of Religion.
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India
Judicial Independence is a crucial matter, as it ensures that the trusted public reposit in the same, continue to exist. As it is the judiciary that has been entrusted with the duty to protect values enshrined in the constitution and protect the fundamental rights. For more details contact @ Advocate Prakhar Gupta
Binoy Visman v Union of India
Article 14 is fons juris of the Constitution, and the fountainhead of justice. It must be noted though, that differential treatment per se do not amount to violation of Article 14, it is necessary that differential treatment is based on NO reasonable basis.
Nar Singh Pal v Union of India
Can a person waive off any of his fundamental rights?
Fundamental rights as guaranteed by the constitution were made, not only to benefit individuals but also to secure the interest of the community at large. Further, it is also a possibility wherein for a promise of transitory and immediate benefits, individuals could be lured into (worst forced to) forgo their precious personal freedoms.
Although it is to be noted that in the USA, one can waive one’s fundamental rights.
The State of West Bengal vs. Anwar Ali Sarkarhabib Mohammed
Article 14 secures all persons within territories of India against arbitrary law as well as arbitrary actions of law. “Reasonable Classification” was a test that was proposed to check whether any legislation is discriminatory and hence violative of Article 14.
Ghostline Legal