Nandan Biomatrix Ltd. vs S. Ambika Devi
A seed-related company often the purpose of producing foundation and other commercial seeds, an arrangement is entered between farmers and seed companies regarding the sale and buyback. This litigation by farmers is often made before Consumer Forums, for grievance redressal, this particular judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India defines whether such arrangement would […]
State Of Gujarat vs Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal
Economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail. The economic offence having deep rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds needs to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby […]
Vasu Dev Singh v. Union of India
In delegated legislation the delegate completes the legislation by supplying details within the limits prescribed by the statute and in the case of conditional legislation the power of legislation is exercised by the legislature conditionally leaving to the discretion of an external authority the time and manner of carrying its legislation into effect as also […]
Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal vs State Of Gujarat
Marital relationship means the legally protected marital interest of one spouse to another which include a marital obligation to another like companionship, living under the same roof, sexual relation and the exclusive enjoyment of them, to have children, their upbringing, services in the home, support, affection, love, liking and so on. Extra-marital relationship as such is not defined in any law. Whilst extramarital relationships can have a severe impact marital relationship of a person, this tort popularly known as the “Heart Balm” tort paves a way for the person so injured to claim damages.
In re Kenneth Humphrey
Any lawyer practicing in court in India could attest to the fact that various people accused of various crimes, even after getting a favorable bail order are not able to exercise their liberty, the same may be originating from various reasons but mostly from the poor financial condition the accused suffers. It is further to be noted that intersectionality of various other factors along with financial unwell being might again be one of the most prominent reasons why the person ended up in Jail in the first place. Various reforms have taken place in India’s justice delivery system, to tackle the arrest at first instance as well, but the problem is very prominent. California’s Supreme Court recently took cognizance of the same, and observed that indigent people cannot be allowed to languish in jail just because they are not able to post bail, and equated such practice “pretrial detention order”.
Shiv Shankar Singh v State of Bihar
Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the Magistrate to take cognizance of an offence based on the complaint. It is recourse available to the complainant (private citizen) in addition to Section 154 of the CrPC. In this landmark judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court deliberates on certain practical problems that might arise concerning the filing of a complaint under section 200 of the CrPC.
State of Bombay v Bombay Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has in a number of cases evolved various guiding principles to determine whether an undertaking is analogous to trade or business. In this landmark judgment following observations were made.
The Ahmedabad St. Xaviers College vs State Of Gujarat
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on Protection of Minorities and Freedom of Religion.
Ethiopian Airlines vs Ganesh Narain Saboo
It is to be noted that before Consumer Redressal Fora, only provisions which have been explicitly incorporate from CPC can be invoked. expressio unius est exclusio alterius is legal maxim applicable in present case.
State of Gujarat v. Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni
For an employer-employee relationship to exist, it is required that there exists an employer, employee, and a contract of employment. In this landmark judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court lists several factors that must be taken into consideration for the test of the employer-employee relationship.
Ghostline Legal